New iPhone (phew)
Monday, June 8, 2009 at 9:46PM
I must admit, I was waiting on bated breath for the announcement of a new iPhone. I had been checking the rumor sites for weeks, I kept refreshing Apple's home page, and I was diligently following engadget's live blogging from the WWDC.After a slew ofannouncementsand rehashes about iPhone OS 3.0, I started to get a bit nervous. As a first-generation iPhone owner (yes, I was one of the idiots who overpaid on the first day), I and millions of others were ready for an upgrade now that our 2-year service contract was nearing its end.
I was delighted when they finallyunveiledthis new version of the iPhone, the iPhone 3G S, with its many features. I can now pass along my iPhone and its diminishing battery life to another so that I may one-up the 3G owners who shoved things like GPS in my face for nearly a year. Many other sites cover these features and specs more thoroughly than I will, but I will give you my opinion on a few of them.
- What I was most excited about was the new storage capacity of 32 GB. With my current iPhone able to store only 8 GB, I found that quite limiting, especially since I had always liked to keep my entire music library -- at almost 28 GB -- on my iPod. With the 8 GB iPhone, I resorted to creating a Smart Playlist containing only music that I had rated with 4 or 5 stars. While this created a good "best-of" playlist, it had the unfortunate effect of said playlist becoming repetitive and stale. And I must admit, I kind of liked Richard Marx popping into my earbuds every now and then (perhaps more "then" than "now"). With the new storage capacity, I now have the opportunity to have my entire music library available to me again, although I'll probably opt to not have all of it, in lieu of having a bunch of apps, photos, videos, and podcasts.
- The next feature I was thrilled to see was universal search, aka Spotlight. There are endless times when I can only remember one small word or detail about a calendar event, contact, song, etc. that having Spotlight searching everything will fix.
- Copy and paste seems to be the one everyone is ga-ga to have, but I fear that the actual implementation will be a bitunwieldy. iPhone users can sympathize with the frustration of trying to maneuver the magnified cursor between the letters "i" and "l." Now imagine trying that AND dragging to highlight another set of text. I'll believe it when I see it.
- The TomTom app they demonstrated seems like a huge leap beyond those countless throw-away (yet useful) apps that go for 99 cents or less. With the optional windshield holder and charger, it seems like an actual, powerful, upgradeable replacement for on-dash GPS devices. I can only guess that being as such -- and possibly eating into TomTom's product sales -- this app will come with a hefty price tag. TomTom won't want to price it too low as to cannibalize their other products. This begs the question, will iPhone app users pay more than $50 for an app?
- The feature that seemed to draw some excitement but for which I have serious doubts was the voice control. This new feature lets you hold down the home button until a voice prompt activates. You can than ask things like, "What song is playing," and the device's text-to-speech will tell you the song and artist. They seem to present this as a means of convenience. However, if you were holding the device anyway, you could simply double-click the home button to reveal the name of the song. I don't see the benefit.
So the iPhone 3G S doesn't seem like a huge improvement over the current iPhone 3G, but it is a huge improvement over the first-gen iPhone, so I'll be there on June 19 at the Menlo Park Mall to pick mine up.
Matthew Snodgrass |
6 Comments |
iphone,
iphone 3g s,
mattsnod in
Technology 

Reader Comments (6)
I'm disappointed that AT&T won't be supporting features like tethering and mobile download of video through iTunes. My great hope is that Verizon will be carrying the iPhone before my contract is up. I'm completely fed up with AT&T.
I already have a dashboard mount for my iPhone, and if the TomTom app will work on the 3G, I would definitely pay $50 for it. In a pinch, I use the iPhone Maps application to get me where I need to go, but it's sort of awkward. I'd pay a premium for a true turn-by-turn GPS display. Plus, with Sirius on my dashboard, I don't have room (or another power outlet) for a dedicated GPS.
AT&T's Mark Siegel has stated, "We will be offering a tethering plan and MMS for the iPhone." The word is, they're both coming soon, but the "plan" part of that concerns me. Unlike the other international providers, it sounds like AT&T will be charging even more to add this functionality. This is bad for a couple of reasons:
1) AT&T (and others in the U.S.) are already taking a lot of flack over their bloated smart phone pricing plans. Rumor was that they may start to lower them in response to customer complaints, now that so many more people are using smart phones over, uh, dumb phones?
2) AT&T has to realize that people use Safari on their iPhone just like Safari on their laptop. They're pulling down the same pages with the same page weight, so what's it to them? It's just stupid.
I wouldn't count on Verizon getting the iPhone anytime soon. The iPhone has breathed new life into AT&T leading up to the introduction of the phone (discounting the general economic downturn affecting everyone). They will hold onto that exclusivity -- unfortunately for us -- for dear life.
And please be careful that you can actually still see out of your windshield :)
AT&T should have been on stage at WWDC with a single slide Keynote presentation: "We'll support it." That is, without question, without fuss, without extra cost to their customers.
The poor experience customers have with AT&T performance, service and support has become a hinderance to Apple's long-term growth potential. I think conservatively speaking, a Verizon iPhone offering would triple Apple's install base within a year. This is critical to Apple at this point, especially since their market share in the US is so much higher than elsewhere around the world. They can't afford to only rely on repeat customers at the end of each contract. The new $99 phones will help somewhat, but it can't be their whole story.
AT&T is also a barrier for enterprise adoption in many cases, since companies frequently have deals with only one service provider. Companies using Verizon simply will not be customers for Apple. This is Apple's final hurdle, and a vital part of enterprise adoption of Macintosh eventually. They've done a great deal to add support for Exchange in the iPhone (as well as Leopard and now even more with Snow Leopard). There is a gold mine of business they can steal away from RIM by opening the iPhone up to other providers.
I just don't see how AT&T can afford to write a big enough check to make it worth it for Apple.
I would love for any U.S. carrier to be available to any U.S. phone. Verizon on the iPhone is the dream. I just think it'll be a while before it becomes the reality. The upside is, in the interim, AT&T can only get better. It's not like they're going to start removing cell towers, so as mediocre as they are, their service will only improve.
A Verizon iPhone would be a dream come true. Switching to AT&T was/is the sacrifice for owning an iPhone. More Bars in More Places...really? where?
Speculation is that 2011 could see a Verizon iPhone - http://news.cnet.com/8301-13579_3-10249922-37.html . As Verizon upgrades to a 4G network, the technologies may line up. Or, it'll be interesting to see how much money AT&T pays to hold onto the exclusive.
On another note, how come Dave and I are the only ones that ever comment?!?
You and Dave are the two smartest people on the Internet.